Sunday, October 11, 2009

Pride in America

Walk into any American high school on a Friday afternoon. You won’t have to wonder what the school’s colors are—half the students and staff will be wearing them. If there’s a game that night, you’ll know it by an air of excitement and cheerleaders carrying pom poms to classes. It doesn’t really matter if the home team is winning or losing—there’ll be a general sense of unity, optimism, and support for the team. If the coach happens by, people will bob their heads in acknowledgment and call him by his title of respect, “Coach.” All differences are put aside on game day, and all hearts are focused on winning.

Not every day is game day, of course, but that spirit of pride, togetherness, and belonging to something bigger than oneself is part of what motivates everyone in the building to do their day-to-day work. It helps individuals believe in their institution and what it stands for and to value their place in it. Educators know that school spirit is one factor that helps create a positive atmosphere, a sense of mutual cooperation and support, and high achievement.

In a good school—as in a good company or even a strong family—there’s a general sense of pride in belonging. That’s true of countries, as well. And I submit that in America, the Dysfunctional Family, that spirit of pride, ownership, and support for the home team is tragically, and even dangerously, lacking.

The day after an election is game day in America. And for months, now, our coach and our team have been playing to largely empty stands on the home field. Our improbable national cheerleaders—the Limbaughs, Becks, and Palens—have been rooting for the other teams. People who call themselves Americans have been cheering when the others score points. And those of us who want to cheer for our coach and our team often feel that we have to do so quietly or risk being mocked, criticized, or even threatened by the allegedly “loyal” opposition and those who support them.

When Chicago was not chosen as the site for the 2016 Olympics and Rio de Janeiro was, some so-called Americans cheered. Never mind that the United States has been privileged to host the Olympic games a dozen times while the entire continent of South America never has. Never mind that practically the entire population of Rio turned out to show their support and enthusiasm and willingness to work for the honor of hosting the games, while in America, as usual, cynical and negative voices turned the entire process into a mean-spirited “debate.” Never mind that the selection process had been going on for years. America behaved as though the entire matter revolved on a single speech by our president, a last shout just before the final touchdown. And when America wasn’t the winner of the game, the loudest voices were cheering the so-called “failure” of their country.

And when America wins—as when an international committee awards our president one of the world’s highest honors—crowds on the home side boo. When America wins, they shake their fists at the referee.

What’s wrong with this picture?

Follow Citizen Jane on Twitter!

4 comments:

Six said...

Sheesh - your posts are getting more and more depressing... you just really like to pile on the people for not all fawning and falling in to place awaiting marching orders.

Your analogy as well as your mention of people 'booing' over the Nobel PEACE price reminded me of an Olympic event several years ago. I am a big boxing fan, and I remember in the Seoul S. Korea 1988 Olympics Roy Jones Jr as a dominating force. In the gold medal match he faced a S. Korean in the most anticipated boxing match for the home crowd probably ever. Jones Jr. dominated in every way measurable short of knocking him out (althogh he nearly did) - landing greater than 2 to 1 punches. Inexplicably the judges awarded the Dec. and the gold medal to the S. Korean fighter. The S. Koreans booed thier own fighter out of shame of the clear bias, and the fighter himself apologized to Jones Jr for the obvious and clear wrong decision. Were the S. Koreans un-patriotic for booing thier own gold medal victory?

To Obama's defense on the Peace prize... he is the first American President in the last 25 years or so not to invade another country - however it is important to note that we still have 3+, possibly more, years to go. Perhaps this was a preemptive award...

Idna said...

Any good debate should have a definition of terms. Your definition of "Pride in America" seems to be very different from mine (and I assume, the definition of all those nasty, vicious personages of the Right that you regularly lambaste.)

It seems to me that for you "Pride in America" means being a cheerleader for Coach Obama. I don't see a whole lot of pride or 'what's right with America' in your posts on this blog. You say America is Dysfunctional ... why? because half the country is not infatuated by the "Coach" and have major disagreements with the direction he is trying to take the country. Last time I checked, that's one of the RIGHTS we have in this great country. Can't say the same about many others around the globe.

Our Coach is loved by many of these same countries. Does that mean they have "Pride in America"? Hardly. Why do they love him so? Could it be because of what they hear from his own mouth?

Coach O's speeches on foreign soil show a desire to take America down a notch or two. He has spoken about America's moral culpability and heavy-handedness, it's guilt for its treatment of other nations and peoples. Obama indicted his own country for arrogance, for dismissiveness and derisiveness, for maltreatment of natives, for torture, for Hiroshima, for Guantánamo, for unilateralism, and for insufficient respect for the Muslim world.

Hell of a Pep Talk for the Team! No wonder lesser countries delight in this talk and shower awards on him.

If anyone lacks pride in his Team, it seem to be the Coach himself. Could this be why the attempt to FUNDAMENTALLY change the country? Quite a leap from Presidents who saw America as "the shining city on the hill" that others look up to.

BO was elected US President, not King of the World. He and others should remember that.

Idna said...

Any good debate should have a definition of terms. Your definition of "Pride in America" seems to be very different from mine (and I assume, the definition of all those nasty, vicious personages of the Right that you regularly lambaste.)

It seems to me that for you "Pride in America" means being a cheerleader for Coach Obama. I don't see a whole lot of pride or 'what's right with America' in your posts on this blog. You say America is Dysfunctional ... why? because half the country is not infatuated by the "Coach" and have major disagreements with the direction he is trying to take the country. Last time I checked, that's one of the RIGHTS we have in this great country. Can't say the same about many others around the globe.

Our Coach is loved by many of these same countries. Does that mean they have "Pride in America"? Hardly. Why do they love him so? Could it be because of what they hear from his own mouth?

Coach O's speeches on foreign soil show a desire to take America down a notch or two. He has spoken about America's moral culpability and heavy-handedness, it's guilt for its treatment of other nations and peoples. Obama indicted his own country for arrogance, for dismissiveness and derisiveness, for maltreatment of natives, for torture, for Hiroshima, for Guantánamo, for unilateralism, and for insufficient respect for the Muslim world.

Hell of a Pep Talk for the Team! No wonder lesser countries delight in this talk and shower awards on him.

If anyone lacks pride in his Team, it seem to be the Coach himself. Could this be why the attempt to FUNDAMENTALLY change the country? Quite a leap from Presidents who saw America as "the shining city on the hill" that others look up to.

BO was elected US President, not King of the World. He and others should remember that.

Citizen Jane said...

Hi, Idna,

Should you choose to read the book, I'd be happy to discuss it with you. Meanwhile, I think I made it clear in my original post that I'm opposed to anyone's pastor making public policy.

That said, I've also made it clear that I have no objection to people of faith. Dr. King is honored for his personal courage and contributions to social change--not for his religion. This summer, I visited the museum near his home and grave in Atlanta. It is definitely a secular, not a religious, shrine.